Introduction
We've come a long way from the days when one of the knee-jerk answers to the question
"What should I eat?" was "You can't go wrong with carbohydrates." We now know that
carbohydrates, the staple of most diets, aren't all good or all bad. Some kinds promote health
while others, when eaten often and in large quantities, actually increase the risk for diabetes
and coronary heart disease.

The wild popularity of the Atkins, South Beach, and other low-carbohydrate diets led many
Americans to believe that carbohydrates are "bad," the source of unflattering flab, and a
cause of the obesity epidemic. That's a dangerous oversimplification, on a par with "fat is
bad." Easily digested carbohydrates from white bread, white rice, pastries, sugared sodas,
and other highly processed foods may, indeed, contribute to weight gain and interfere with
weight loss. Whole grains, beans, fruits, vegetables, and other sources of intact
carbohydrates do just the opposite—they promote good health.

What Are Carbohydrates?
Carbohydrates are found in a wide array of foods—bread, beans, milk, popcorn, potatoes,
cookies, spaghetti, soft drinks, corn, and cherry pie. They also come in a variety of forms. The
most common and abundant forms are sugars, fibers, and starches.

The basic building block of every carbohydrate is a sugar molecule, a simple union of
carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Starches and fibers are essentially chains of sugar
molecules. Some contain hundreds of sugars. Some chains are straight, others branch
wildly.

    ITEM:  Carbohydrates were once grouped into two main categories. Simple
    carbohydrates included sugars such as fruit sugar (fructose), corn or grape sugar
    (dextrose or glucose), and table sugar (sucrose). Complex carbohydrates included
    everything made of three or more linked sugars. Complex carbohydrates were
    thought to be the healthiest to eat, while simple carbohydrates weren't so great. It
    turns out that the picture is more complicated than that.

The digestive system handles all carbohydrates in much the same way—it breaks them
down (or tries to break them down) into single sugar molecules, since only these are small
enough to cross into the bloodstream. It also converts most digestible carbohydrates into
glucose (also known as blood sugar), because cells are designed to use this as a universal
energy source.

When Sugar Management Goes Awry: Insulin and Diabetes
When you eat a food containing carbohydrates, the digestive system breaks down the
digestible ones into sugar, which then enters the blood. As blood sugar levels rise, special
cells in the pancreas churn out more and more insulin, a hormone that signals cells to
absorb blood sugar for energy or storage. As cells sponge up blood sugar, its levels in the
bloodstream begin to fall. That's when other cells in the pancreas start making glucagon, a
hormone that tells the liver to start releasing stored sugar. This interplay of insulin and
glucagon ensure that cells throughout the body, and especially in the brain, have a steady
supply of blood sugar.

In some people, this cycle doesn't work properly. People with type 1 diabetes (once called
insulin-dependent or juvenile diabetes) don't make enough insulin, so their cells can't
absorb sugar. People with type 2 diabetes (once called non-insulin-dependent, or adult-
onset diabetes) generally start out with a different problem—their cells don't respond well to
insulin's "open up for sugar" signal. This condition, known as insulin resistance, causes
blood sugar and insulin levels to stay high long after eating. Over time, the heavy demands
made on the insulin-making cells wears them out, and insulin production slows, then stops.

Insulin resistance isn't just a blood sugar problem. It has also been linked with a variety of
other problems, including high blood pressure, high levels of triglycerides, low HDL (good)
cholesterol, and excess weight. In fact, it travels with these problems so often that the
combination has been given the name metabolic syndrome. (1) Alone and as part of the
metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance can lead to type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and
possibly some cancers.

Genes, a sedentary lifestyle, being overweight, and a diet rich in processed carbohydrates
can each promote insulin resistance. (The combination is far worse.) Data from the Insulin
Resistance Atherosclerosis Study suggests that cutting back on refined grains and eating
more whole grains in their place can improve insulin sensitivity. (2) As described in "Health
Gains from Whole Grains", the benefit of eating whole grains extends far beyond insulin to
helping prevent type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis (the build-up of cholesterol-filled patches
that clog and narrow artery walls), heart disease, colorectal cancer, and premature death
from noncardiac, noncancer causes.

Carbohydrates and the Glycemic Index
Dividing carbohydrates into simple and complex makes sense on a chemical level. But it
doesn't do much to explain what happens to different kinds of carbohydrates inside the body.
For example, the starch in white bread and French-fried potatoes clearly qualifies as a
complex carbohydrate. Yet the body converts this starch to blood sugar nearly as fast as it
processes pure glucose. Fructose (fruit sugar) is a simple carbohydrate, but it has a minimal
effect on blood sugar.

A new system, called the glycemic index, aims to classify carbohydrates based on how
quickly and how high they boost blood sugar compared to pure glucose.(3) Foods with a high
glycemic index, like white bread, cause rapid spikes in blood sugar. Foods with a low
glycemic index, like whole oats, are digested more slowly, causing a lower and gentler
change in blood sugar. Foods with a score of 70 or higher are defined as having a high
glycemic index; those with a score of 55 or below have a low glycemic index.


Glycemic Index  



Diets rich in high-glycemic-index foods, which cause quick and strong increases in blood
sugar levels, have been linked to an increased risk for diabetes, (5) heart disease, (6, 7) and
overweight, (8, 9,10) and there is preliminary work linking high-glycemic diets to age-related
macular degeneration, (11) ovulatory infertility, (12) and colorectal cancer. (13) Foods with a
low glycemic index have been shown to help control type 2 diabetes and improve weight
loss. Other studies, though, have found that the glycemic index has little effect on weight or
health. This sort of flip-flop is part of the normal process of science, and it means that the
true value of the glycemic index remains to be determined. In the meantime, eating whole
grains, beans, fruits, and vegetables—all foods with a low glycemic index—is indisputably
good for many aspects of health.

One of the most important factors that determine a food's glycemic index is how much it has
been processed. Milling and grinding removes the fiber-rich outer bran and the vitamin- and
mineral-rich inner germ, leaving mostly the starchy endosperm. (See the sidebar, Nutrition In-
Depth, for more information on what affects a food's glycemic index.)


One thing that a food's glycemic index does not tell us is how much digestible carbohydrate it
delivers. Take watermelon as an example. The sweet-tasting fruit has a very high glycemic
index. But a slice of watermelon has only a small amount of carbohydrate per serving (as the
name suggests, watermelon is made up mostly of water). That's why researchers developed
a related way to classify foods that takes into account both the amount of carbohydrate in the
food and the impact of that carbohydrate on blood sugar levels. This measure is called the
glycemic load. (14, 15) A food's glycemic load is determined by multiplying its glycemic index
by the amount of carbohydrate it contains. In general, a glycemic load of 20 or more is high,
11 to 19 is medium, and 10 or under is low.

You can't use the glycemic index to rule your dietary choices. For example, a Snickers bar has
a glycemic index of 41, marking it as a low glycemic index food. But it is far from a health food.
Instead, use it as a general guide. Whenever possible, replace highly processed grains,
cereals, and sugars with minimally processed whole grain products. And only eat potatoes—
once on the list of preferred complex carbohydrates—occasionally because of their high
glycemic index and glycemic load.  

Good Carbs, not No Carbs
Some popular diets treat carbohydrates as if they are evil, the root of all body fat and excess
weight. That was certainly true for the original Atkins diet, which popularized the no-carb
approach to dieting. And there is some evidence that a low-carbohydrate diet may help
people lose weight more quickly than a low-fat diet, although so far, that evidence is short
term.

In two short, head-to-head trials, (16, 17) low-carb approaches worked better than low-fat
diets. A later year-long study, published in 2007 in the Journal of the American Medical
Association, showed the same thing. In this study, overweight, premenopausal women went
on one of four diets: Atkins, Zone, Ornish, or LEARN, a standard low-fat, moderately high-
carbohydrate diet. The women in all four groups steadily lost weight for the first six months,
with the most rapid weight loss occurring among the Atkins dieters. After that, most of the
women started to regain weight. At the end of a year, it looked as though the women in the
Atkins group had lost the most weight, about 10 pounds, compared with a loss of almost 6
pounds for the LEARN group, 5 for the Ornish group, and 3.5 for the Zone group. (18) Levels
of harmful LDL, protective HDL, and other blood lipids were at least as good among women
on the Atkins diet as among those on the low-fat diet.

If you read the fine print of the study, though, it turns out that few of the women actually stuck
with their assigned diets. Those on the Atkins diet were supposed to limit their carbohydrate
intake to 50 grams a day, but they took in almost triple that amount. The Ornish dieters were
supposed to limit their fat intake to under 10 percent of their daily calories, but they got about
30 percent from fat. There were similar deviations for the Zone and LEARN groups. What this
and other diet comparisons tell us is that sticking with a diet is more important than the diet
itself.

No one knows the long-term effects of eating little or no carbohydrates. Equally worrisome is
the inclusion of unhealthy fats in some of these diets.

If you want to go the lower carb route, try to include some fruits, vegetables, and whole grain
carbohydrates every day. They contain a host of vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients that
are essential for good health and that you can't get out of a supplement bottle. And do your
heart a favor by choosing healthy fats and proteins to go along with those healthy
carbohydrates: A 20-year prospective study of 82,802 women looked at the relationship
between lower carbohydrate diets and heart disease; a subsequent study looked at lower
carbohydrate diets and risk of diabetes. Women who ate low-carbohydrate diets that were
high in vegetable sources of fat or protein had a 30 percent lower risk of heart disease (7)
and a modestly lower risk of type 2 diabetes, (19) compared to women who ate high-
carbohydrate, low-fat diets. But women who ate low-carbohydrate diets that were high in
animal fats or proteins did not have a reduced risk of heart disease or diabetes.(7, 19)  

Adding Good Carbohydrates
For optimal health, get your grains intact from foods such as whole wheat bread, brown rice,
whole grain pasta, and other possibly unfamiliar grains like quinoa, whole oats, and bulgur.
Not only will these foods help protect you against a range of chronic diseases, they can also
please your palate and your eyes.

Until recently, you could only get whole-grain products in organic or non-traditional stores.
Today they are popping up in more and more mainstream grocery stores. Here are some
suggestions for adding more good carbohydrates to your diet:

Try brown rice with a twist: Check out this recipe for Spicy Coconut Rice with Limes, courtesy
of Harvard University Dining Services.  
Start the day with whole grains. If you're partial to hot cereals, try old-fashioned or steel-cut
oats. If you're a cold cereal person, look for one that lists whole wheat, whole oats, or other
whole grain first on the ingredient list.
Use whole grain breads for lunch or snacks. Check the label to make sure that whole wheat
or another whole grain is the first ingredient listed.   Bag the potatoes. Instead, try brown rice
or even "newer" grains like bulgur, wheat berries, millet, or hulled barley with your dinner.   
Pick up some whole wheat pasta. If the whole grain products are too chewy for you, look for
those that are made with half whole-wheat flour and half white flour.   Bring on the beans.
Beans are an excellent source of slowly digested carbohydrates as well as a great source of
protein.

References
1. Johnson LW, Weinstock RS. The metabolic syndrome: concepts and controversy. Mayo
Clinic Proceedings. 2006; 81:1615–20.  

2. Liese AD, Roach AK, Sparks KC, Marquart L, D'Agostino RB, Jr., Mayer-Davis EJ. Whole-
grain intake and insulin sensitivity: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003; 78:965–71.  

3. Ludwig DS. Clinical update: the low-glycaemic-index diet. Lancet. 2007; 369:890–2.  

4. Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and
glycemic load values: 2002. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2002; 76:5–56.  

5. de Munter JS, Hu FB, Spiegelman D, Franz M, van Dam RM. Whole grain, bran, and germ
intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study and systematic review. PLoS
Med. 2007; 4:e261.  

6. Beulens JW, de Bruijne LM, Stolk RP, et al. High dietary glycemic load and glycemic index
increase risk of cardiovascular disease among middle-aged women: a population-based
follow-up study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007; 50:14–21.  

7. Halton TL, Willett WC, Liu S, et al. Low-carbohydrate-diet score and the risk of coronary
heart disease in women. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006; 355:1991–2002.  

8. Anderson JW, Randles KM, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ. Carbohydrate and fiber
recommendations for individuals with diabetes: a quantitative assessment and meta-
analysis of the evidence. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2004; 23:5–17.  

9. Ebbeling CB, Leidig MM, Feldman HA, Lovesky MM, Ludwig DS. Effects of a low-glycemic
load vs low-fat diet in obese young adults: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007; 297:2092–102.  

10. Maki KC, Rains TM, Kaden VN, Raneri KR, Davidson MH. Effects of a reduced-glycemic-
load diet on body weight, body composition, and cardiovascular disease risk markers in
overweight and obese adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007; 85:724–34.  

11. Chiu CJ, Hubbard LD, Armstrong J, et al. Dietary glycemic index and carbohydrate in
relation to early age-related macular degeneration. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
2006; 83:880–6.  

12. Chavarro JE, Rich-Edwards JW, Rosner BA, Willett WC. A prospective study of dietary
carbohydrate quantity and quality in relation to risk of ovulatory infertility. European Journal of
Clinical Nutrition. 2007.  

13. Strayer L, Jacobs DR, Jr., Schairer C, Schatzkin A, Flood A. Dietary carbohydrate, glycemic
index, and glycemic load and the risk of colorectal cancer in the BCDDP cohort. Cancer
Causes and Control. 2007; 18:853–63.  

14. Liu S, Willett WC. Dietary glycemic load and atherothrombotic risk. Curr Atheroscler Rep.
2002; 4:454–61.  

15. Willett W, Manson J, Liu S. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2002; 76:274S–80S.  

16. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for
obesity. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003; 348:2082–90.  

17. Samaha FF, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, et al. A low-carbohydrate as compared with a low-fat
diet in severe obesity. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003; 348:2074–81.  

18. Gardner CD, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and
LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal
women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007; 297:969–77.  

19. Halton TL, Liu S, Manson JE, Hu FB. Low-carbohydrate-diet score and risk of type 2
diabetes in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:339-46.    
Straight Talk on Fitness
WebBlog Entry
December 5, 2005

INTRODUCTION TO CARBOHYDRATES:  
Courtesy of Harvard University Department of Health
(c) Copyright. 2000 -  2009. Mike Stewart Fitness
Eat Healthy / Lift Heavy.  
All Rights Reserved.